The trap of building for an imaginary customer
$3M
Vacation Tracker ARR ($250k/mo)
$15M+
Rentman ARR
$10,000+
Arsen's SaaS Monthly Revenue
Most technical founders burn months of runway building software for an imaginary market. They write code in isolation, launch on Product Hunt, and face total silence. The core reason is simple: guessing what people need instead of living the pain.
A select group of indie hackers avoid this trap. Instead of guessing, they build inside active service agencies and traditional businesses. Lav Crnobrnja ran a software development agency and scaled it until an internal operational bottleneck got in the way. Instead of ignoring it, his team built a solution and launched it publicly. That tool became Vacation Tracker, which now brings in over $250,000 a month, totaling $3 million in annual recurring revenue (Indie Hackers).
Roy faced a similar reality years earlier. As a teenager renting out speakers, he dealt with broken spreadsheets and messy workflows. He turned that firsthand operational gap into Rentman, scaling it into a SaaS business generating over $15 million in ARR (Indie Hackers), a prime example of 전통 산업 현장의 고통에서 1,500만 달러 ARR SaaS를 발굴하는 법. Another founder, Arsen, used an agency as both a testing ground and distribution channel to hit over $10,000 a month (Indie Hackers).
Action produces information. Shipping fast and solving an internal workflow problem beats endless market research every single time.
The agency-to-SaaS blueprint in action
Using an agency as a launching pad solves the two hardest problems in early-stage software startups at once: real user validation and go-to-market distribution.
Lav Crnobrnja did not start Vacation Tracker by reading market trend reports. He started it because his own agency needed a reliable way to manage time off and team vacations smoothly as headcount grew. When you build to fix your own daily friction, you have genuine founder-market fit. You are the user. You know instantly if a feature is useful or just noise.
The operational stack for this transition is lean. Founders typically rely on internal project management tools, direct client feedback loops, and fast deployment setups to push updates on the same day an agency bottleneck occurs. There is no guesswork involved in the product roadmap. If the agency team complains about a broken workflow on Tuesday, the software patch is designed and tested by Wednesday.
Decision-making principles behind the pivot
The primary decision-making principle shared by these founders is operational honesty. As Roy noted during his scaling journey, his own adaptation speed was the bottleneck at every growth stage, not the market and not the team. Recognizing when an internal service tool has broader market appeal requires stepping back from billable hours to look at the bigger picture.
Another core principle is treating the agency as a distribution advantage. When you launch the product, your agency clients or industry peers form the initial user base. They already trust your execution capabilities. This reduces the customer acquisition costs that often hinder traditional software startups early on.
To make this transition work, founders rely on a strict set of tools and routines:
- Internal workflow logs to identify repetitive tasks that consume more than five hours a week.
- Lean development frameworks to ship minimum viable features directly inside active service environments.
- Direct feedback channels where agency employees act as the first line of QA testers.
The hidden risks of the service-to-product model
This approach sounds straightforward on paper, but the execution involves serious operational friction.
Running client services while trying to build a scalable software product creates a conflict for attention. Client deadlines generate immediate revenue and urgent demands, whereas software development is a long-term bet with delayed rewards. It is easy for founders to get trapped indefinitely in a service-heavy model because the agency cash flow props up the business, removing the urgency needed to finish the product code.
Furthermore, building a product for your own agency can create a blind spot. Your agency workflow might be entirely unique to your specific niche or team structure, meaning the broader market might not care about the problem you spent six months automating.
Replicating the playbook
- 1
Audit Internal Operations
Identify repetitive manual tasks, messy spreadsheets, and communication gaps.
- 2
Build & Test Internally
Develop a simple internal script or tool to fix the issue and test it with your agency team.
- 3
Generalize the Product
Strip away custom agency-specific code to make the tool broadly applicable.
- 4
Launch Standalone SaaS
Ship the finalized tool publicly as an independent software product.
For a solo founder or indie hacker currently running an agency or freelance business, the path forward requires a shift in perspective. Stop viewing internal operational headaches as annoying distractions. Treat them as product opportunities.
Examine your current weekly operations. Look for the messy spreadsheets, the manual data entry tasks, and the communication gaps between team members and clients. If you are experiencing that pain, dozens of similar agencies are likely bleeding time and money on the exact same workflow. Build a simple internal script or tool to fix it for yourself, test it with your team, strip away the custom agency-specific code, and ship it as a standalone SaaS.
참고 자료
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. Is it realistic to build a SaaS while running an active service agency?
Yes, many founders use agencies as a testing ground because it provides an immediate feedback loop and solves real operational problems, eliminating the need to guess what customers want.
Q. How do you transition clients from an agency mindset to paying for a standalone software product?
The software should directly solve a recurring bottleneck that you already experienced internally, making it natural to market first to peers or clients who share the exact same workflow issues.
Q. What are the main risks of running an agency and a SaaS at the same time?
Client work can easily consume all available bandwidth, reducing the engineering focus available for product development. Founders must prioritize their development time to avoid staying trapped in a service-heavy model.